Dispute Settlement Counsel

Posts Tagged ‘Confidentiality’

It’s great that there are now two new shows which focus on mediation as an alternative to the court process.  One is Fairly Legal (Thursday at 10 pm EST on USA Network); the other is Harry’s Law (Mondays at 10 pm EST on NBC).

Fairly Legal’s premise is the use of mediation to resolve disputes rather than going to court and fighting through a litigation process.  The lead character, Kate Reed, is a lawyer who walked away from the litigation side of the profession to become a mediator.

Episodes I’ve watched have portrayed employment, intellectual property, divorce and criminal cases resolved by the creative intervention of the mediator.  At the end of the February 24 episode, Kate gave a presentation to a room full of lawyers on the advantages of mediation over court-based litigation, making the case we have been making -  it saves time, saves money, saves relationships, can be more creative in coming up with good solutions and is confidential.

Harry’s Law is a law show with a twist.  The lead lawyer, played by Kathy Bates, runs her law practice out of a shoe store.  This resonates with me because I can envision combining a dispute resolution practice with a breakfast and lunch restaurant – my ultimate goal.

The February 21 episode was on point for two reasons:  It presented two cases, one showing in a compelling way how mediation can be used effectively to resolve a neighborhood gang dispute and the other showing in an equally compelling way how a court-determined verdict fell so short of solving the problem in an employment dispute.

Read the rest of this entry »

I’m often asked how case evaluation is used to resolve a dispute.  The best way to explain is to tell about a case that was resolved using a case evaluator/mediator.

One important prerequisite is that the parties to the dispute – and their lawyers — have to want to resolve the matter quickly and approach it like a problem to solve, not a fight over who is right.  This is sometimes driven by the nature of the case, or by the ability of both parties to see that their interests are not best met by prolonged, expensive and cumbersome litigation.

In this homeowner-contractor dispute, both parties needed to get the issues about payment and continued or discontinued work resolved quickly.  The homeowners’ family life was being disrupted the longer the dispute remained unresolved and the contractor’s ability to earn more money and deploy his resources effectively hung in the balance.   Both lawyers realized that neither client would benefit by the costs and length of litigation, and the matter was not a clear cut case in which one side was clearly right.

I suggested the use of a neutral case evaluator, a lawyer very well versed in construction cases, both with respect to the relevant facts to focus on as well as the state of the law as to these kinds of disputes.  To his credit, my counterpart counsel agreed to put any litigation on hold and we were both able to persuade our clients to try this approach.  There was one procedural snag:  the contractor had put a mechanic’s lien on the house and needed to file a complaint within 90 days to prefect the lien.  We agreed to allow the contractor to file the complaint in order to preserve his right to the lien, and then there would be a standstill agreement and a hold on the litigation to allow time to work with the case evaluator.

Read the rest of this entry »

Part VI. The Sovereignty of the Client

First, for those of you following this series of blog entries closely enough to notice that we skipped a topic – Confidentiality – good work in attentiveness. That’s a great skill for an ADR practitioner or a user to have.

Another is the insight to recognize the need to “call an audible” (a football reference), or step out of the pre-arranged order of things because the situation calls for it. To be adept at creating the type of “thinking outside the box” solutions that can be done in ADR processes is also a key dispute resolution skill. This blog exemplifies these traits.   Read the rest of this entry »

Part V.   Confidentiality

When you file a lawsuit in a court, the lawsuit and information related to it become public information.  Most courts today either utilize electronic filing or will be soon.  You may not think about it or realize it, but this means anyone can go online and find out about your dispute.

Most of the time, parties involved in a dispute would prefer that the fact that they are involved in a conflict as well as its details remain a private matter.  This is especially true of disputes that involve delicate or personal matters, like divorces, probate cases or business disputes between and within families.  But it is also important in cases involving “mission-based organizations” – churches, hospitals, schools and colleges, non-profits, social capitalism enterprises, foundations, green companies, etc. — for whom reputations and confidentiality are important.   Read the rest of this entry »