Dispute Settlement Counsel

Posts Tagged ‘Creative Solutions’

Often I hear attorneys giving their clients an admonition or expressing reservations about using alternative dispute resolution processes like mediation or collaborative law that usually goes something like this: “I don’t think mediation is such a good idea because it’s just a tool used by the other lawyer to obtain free discovery.”

Let’s analyze that statement, looking at it with a reasonable person’s perspective and logic. And let’s test the assumptions inherent in that statement to see if it makes sense. Is the risk of “free discovery” really a serious concern?

Is there anything really problematic with giving the other side “free discovery”? And if “free” discovery is not desirable, then exactly what kind of discovery do we prefer? The opposite of “free” discovery would logically be discovery that is either “paid” for, or one that takes longer and requires the other side to work harder to get. So who is “paying” for the discovery? (Hint: In litigation, if the other side is paying, chances are very good that you are paying too.) Put differently, is the notion of “free discovery” really a misnomer? Read the rest of this entry »

Why Collaborative Practice is a sustainable model for dispute resolution; Part I, Information Exchange

During a recent radio interview for the Business Beat on WICN FM (90.5 fm out of Worcester) host Steve D’Agostino asked if Collaborative Practice was here to stay or a passing fad like the Hula Hoop. It was a great question, the kind which you wish you had more time than a minute to answer. This blog gives me the opportunity to answer it more fully.

Collaborative Practice is here to stay. It will stand the test of time because it is, among other things, a sustainable model, a sort of “greening” of the process of resolving disputes. It will grow in use because it directly answers the questions and concerns like these that today’s clients have:

How can I resolve this dispute quickly?

What is the more efficient and cost-effective process?

How do I resolve this conflict and still maintain a healthy relationship with the party on the other side?

How do I keep this dispute private and confidential?

Is there a way I can have some say and control over the process?

How do we reach resolution without putting the final decisions in the hands of a judge, a jury or a non-appealable arbitrator?

Where can we go to come up with creative solutions that are tailored to our situation?   Read the rest of this entry »

Business owners, managers and entrepreneurs have confirmed some core beliefs of the Zeytoonian Center for Dispute Resolution. They are telling us that the most important element in resolving disputes is preserving important business relationships! They are also telling us that the notion of “winning at all costs” is among the least important considerations in dispute resolution. That is encouraging news and helps to confirm our beliefs about what is critical in dispute resolution and that non-adversarial processes are more responsive and better suited to meet the needs of those involved in disputes. Read the rest of this entry »

What exactly is social enterprise? We read about social capitalist businesses, green companies, and sustainable business practices. One of my favorite magazines, Fast Company, frequently awards top social enterprise businesses and offers stories about how these companies serve some greater purpose beyond making a profit. Recalling Paul Newman’s compelling question in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, I wanted to find out more about exactly “Who are these guys?” It seems there is a natural synergy between resolving disputes using non-adversarial methods and the core values of social enterprise, but I wanted to explore how this synergy could be acted upon in productive ways. 

So recently (3/27/09), I attended the Eleventh Annual Symposium on Spirituality in Business, sponsored by Sustainable Business Network of Boston at Babson College in Wellesley. My purpose was to learn more about the notions of sustainable business and get to know and listen to people who owned and worked with social enterprise businesses. Among the businesses attending was the day’s honoree, Equal Exchange, based in West Bridgewater, MA., a sustainable business built on a model of taking care of employees to the extent that the employees genuinely own the company and make the decisions together.   Read the rest of this entry »

What do Abraham Lincoln, Mark McCormack and Jesus have in common?

They were all respected counselors in their time and pointed out the advantages resolving disputes quickly and efficiently.

Today, I happened to check back with a book I hadn’t read for years: The Terrible Truth About Lawyers, by Mark H. McCormack, a lawyer who is better known as the founder, CEO and Chairman of the International Management Group.  Written in 1987, it was given to me by a relative while I was in law school in 1988.  I read it eagerly then, and hadn’t gone back to it since.

In the interim, my legal career began prosecuting child abuse cases in Westchester County, NY, then litigating all kinds of cases in New York and Massachusetts for the better part of the next two decades. In the process, I crossed paths with processes like Collaborative Law, mediation and ombuds services, getting trained and gathering experience in each and developing an part of my practice in Preventive Law.  As I got on in counseling and representing clients, I’ve come to know that they are best served when we help them prevent disputes from ever arising.  When conflicts do arise, we provide value when we help them work through and resolve disputes effectively using methods best suited to their situations and interests and that are cost, time and resource efficient.  Read the rest of this entry »

Part IV. Ability to design solutions for the specific situation February 14, 2009

(Happy Valentine’s Day!)

Here’s where ADR really separates itself from the limitations of arbitration and litigation and flexes it’s “think outside the box” powers. When there are several interests to be satisfied in a dispute and it’s about more than money, that’s usually a good indicator that your dispute, your situation and set of circumstances needs the creativity and flexibility of ADR processes like collaborative law and mediation.

Courts are designed to really only do two things: 1. Order one party to pay another party money (monetary damages), and 2. order one party to either stop doing something or direct a party to allow the other party to do something (injunctive relief). In business disputes, the court’s ability to quickly intervene and either stop a party from taking an action or allow a party to continue an action without interference can be essential and that is something most ADR processes are not designed to do. But just about everything else, including money payments, can be addressed by ADR methods and as we have already written about, addressed more efficiently and without the collateral damage of litigation. And here’s the fun part: ADR can be very creative, innovative and situational.   Read the rest of this entry »